CO129-197 - Governor Hennessy - 1882 [1-2] — Page 55

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

petition were ultra, and withdrawing and apologizing for them. D. Eitel however in this letter reaffirms, what he stated in substance in his note to me of the 19th September, that those allegations were, as he believed, within the sphere of good faith. His closely ... were made.

Copy of a note received by me to the Question Russell and a copy of his reply, from which it appears that Dr Eitel had previously, made to him circumstantially the same statement as those he communicated to me on the 20th September.

The above named document discloses the fact that Dr Eitel, Secretary to His Excellency the Governor, did, as he alleges, by the authority of His Excellency, make, in formal and circumstantial manner on the 20th September last, most injurious statements affecting the private character, and, as he especially stated, the social position of a gentleman in the Colony, a member of the bar and Queen's Counsel,

and that those Statements are wholly false and absolutely without foundation. Moreover that Dr Eitel, being taken legal proceedings against him at first impugned the correctness of the grounds on which the action was founded, and subsequently...

Edit History

2026-05-22 22:44:48 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct

Live

View comparison

AI Proofread

54petition were ultra, and withdrawing and apologizing for them. D. Eitel however in this letter reaffirms, what he stated in substance in his note to me of the 19th September, that those allegations were, as he believed, within the sphere of good faith. His closely ... were made.Copy of a note received by me to the Question Russell and a copy of his reply, from which it appears that Dr Eitel had previously, made to him circumstantially the same statement as those he communicated to me on the 20th September.The above named document discloses the fact that Dr Eitel, Secretary to His Excellency the Governor, did, as he alleges, by the authority of His Excellency, make, in formal and circumstantial manner on the 20th September last, most injurious statements affecting the private character, and, as he especially stated, the social position of a gentleman in the Colony, a member of the bar and Queen's Counsel,and that those Statements are wholly false and absolutely without foundation. Moreover that Dr Eitel, being taken legal proceedings against him at first impugned the correctness of the grounds on which the action was founded, and subsequently...

Baseline (Original)

܀܀54petition were untra, and withdrawing and apologizing for them. D. Eitel however in this letter reaffirms, what he stated in substance in his note to me of the 19th September, that those allegation and, as he betreed, within the sphere of good faith his cluely were snad enCopy of a nok cxcclieved byme to the Question Russell and a copy of his reply, from which it appear that Dr Eitel had a worth fireviously, made to him circumstantially the same statement as those he communica ke To me on the 20th September.hocePrevaleThe abov name document dis or the fact that Dr Eitel, Scerekiry to His Excellency the Gartner, cond, w he alleges, by the oxfrees cre thority of His Excellency, mads kone, in formal and circumnskar kalkerme on the 20th September last, most injurious statement affecting the private character, and, as hespecially started, the social position of genkeman in the Colony, a member of the bar ane Queens Counsel,and that those Stakmentare a holly fulve and absoluekly without found. akon. Morever that Di Eike?,Ceyel proceeding, being lakon against hem at first impugn the correctness ofongwhich the achon urenanakie on founded, and Subsequently

2026-05-22 22:44:48 · Baseline

View content

܀܀

petition were untra, and withdrawing

and apologizing for them. D. Eitel however in this letter reaffirms, what he stated in substance in his note to me of the 19th September, that those allegation and, as he betreed, within the sphere of good faith his cluely

were snad en

Copy of a nok cxcclieved byme

to the Question Russell and a copy of his reply, from which it appear that Dr Eitel had a worth fireviously, made to him circumstantially the same statement as those he communica ke To me on the 20th September.

Prevale

The abov name document dis or the fact that Dr Eitel, Scerekiry to His Excellency the Gartner, cond, w he alleges, by the oxfrees cre thority of His Excellency, mads kone, in formal and circumnskar kalkerme on the 20th September last, most injurious statement affecting the private character, and, as hespecially started, the social position of genkeman in the Colony, a member of the bar ane Queens Counsel,

and that those Stakmentare a holly fulve and absoluekly without found. akon. Morever that Di Eike?,

Ceyel proceeding, being lakon against hem at first impugn the correctness of ong

which the achon ure

nanakie on

founded, and

Subsequently

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.